tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985711776365144891.post1120701943711677478..comments2023-05-19T11:22:45.301+01:00Comments on Your Coleridge Conservative Action Team: Tesco wont deliver from Mill RoadChris Howellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00788153276499154335noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985711776365144891.post-45836389555650864032009-08-20T02:41:51.540+01:002009-08-20T02:41:51.540+01:00Of course it is only the threat of legal action th...Of course it is only the threat of legal action they could not win that has "changed their mind". <br /><br />I am still not convinced they won't simply ignore the conditions anyway, as they do elsewhere in the country, but saying they won't may be enough to head off the injunction application. A promise made now has none of the impact of an undertaking given to a court. <br /><br />Alternatively, I assume they will persist in what both they and the planning inspector regard as impractical and dangerous (but apparently legal) deliveries until they feel they can use this to justify applying for a variation in the planning condition they don't like. <br /><br />The two most sensible alternatives - find another, more suitable site, or use smaller, more practical delivery vehicles - are, of course, beyond someone like Tesco.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09500676691298806841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985711776365144891.post-81988732686420544062009-08-18T15:58:18.307+01:002009-08-18T15:58:18.307+01:00Their "intention". Hmm.. very reassuring...Their "intention". Hmm.. very reassuring. Nothing with trying to stop legal action perhaps?<br /><br />So they presumably now plan to send 8m (still large) lorries all the way up Catharine Street and then down Sedgwick Street. But they said themselves that would be 'potentially dangerous', nor is it very practical:<br /><br />http://www.nomillroadtesco.org/planning-applications/tesco-admits-loop-delivery-dangerous/<br /><br />So what happens when they realise it's not practical?<br /><br />I think Councillors should not be bluffed by this 'intention' given that there is legal stuff going on.Martinnoreply@blogger.com